![]() Divorce and marriage are ancient institutions of matrimonial and family law, which countries from the ancient times had this as a trend for their regulation through legal provisions. ![]() The research includes the analysis of the causes for divorce in Roman law and how to regulate the dissolution of marriage through legal provisions. This paper tries to comprise different systems of relationship between marriage and nationality. The legal systems of countries can be categorized into two communities: legal systems advocating the imposition of husbands' nationality on wives legal systems opposing the imposition of husbands' nationality on wives. These legal schools experienced different manifestations in the positive laws and regulations of different countries and it is sometimes hard to classify them into an individual legal college. ![]() This college advocated the parting of marriage and nationality and assumed that women's nationality should not change following marriage. However, in the 20th century, a movement identified as feminism surfaced which resulted in the forming of a school called known as "System of. Additionally, the nationality of men should be enforced on women. Within the eighteenth century a college known as "The Unity System of Nationality" mentioned the theory that women should find the nationality with their husbands after marriage. An Appendix to the Article provides a detailed guide to different forms and terms of plural marriage discussed and prohibited in the West-real polygamy, constructive polygamy, successive polygamy, and clerical polygamy. The West may, and in my view should, politely say no to polygamy. And I reject arguments from domestic and international sources that religious freedom norms command the accommodation, if not validation, of religious polygamy. I reject slippery slope arguments, from the right and the left, that acceptance of same-sex marriage must inevitably lead to acceptance of polygamous marriage. I reject ideological arguments, pro and con, that anti-polygamy laws are a form of traditional Christian morality. I conclude that, because these arguments are so different, Western nations can responsibly hold the line against polygamy, even if they choose to accept same-sex marriage and its accompanying norms of sexual liberty, domestic autonomy, equality, and nondiscrimination. I show how the traditional Western cases against polygamy and same-sex unions used strikingly different arguments drawn from the Bible, nature, rights, harm, and symbolism. This Article analyzes the 1,850 year tradition of Western laws against polygamy and the growing constitutional and cultural pressures to reform these laws today. On the frontier of Western family law are hard questions about extending the forms of valid marriage to include polygamy and extending the forums of marital governance to include religious and cultural legal systems that countenance polygamy. ![]() This past generation, children’s rights and same-sex rights have dominated public deliberation and litigation. Two generations ago, contraception, abortion, and women’s rights were the hot topics. Questions about polygamy are likely to dominate Western family law in the next generation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |